🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has claimed to have harvested a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them online.

Possible Boost for AI Development

Observers noted the apparent data breach could boost artificial intelligence firms looking for data to develop their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as performer and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the breach did not represent its entire catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and employed illicit methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Declared Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would probably be utilized for developing AI models.

“Training on illegally sourced data is sadly common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by Meta to train its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “create their own private free version of the service”. The executive added it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between artists, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

A government minister for science, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.